發言人

By 杜德偉

你在談論我在談論也是輿論
為何大聲 可更加公道
你在行路我在行路也是行路
別人地勢 為何特別高
誰又該跟着誰 決定是誰犯了錯
誰又敢否定誰 有道理未必准許
難道誰有權説話 便講真話
誰與誰有權對罵 比高下
誰有擴音筒手持正義騷擾我家
我們有權當做笑話 別説為了大家
李氏黃氏郭氏林氏也是名字
誰是大姓 可更加高明
女仕男仕博士同事也是人仕
是誰犯錯 罪名特別輕
About This Song

The song "" (Speaker) by Du Dewei explores the complexities of public opinion and the double standards present in society. The lyrics engage in a deep and thought-provoking dialogue about who gets to speak their truth and how differing voices are valuedor devaluedin public discourse. The song's emotional core lies in its call for self-awareness and accountability, inviting listeners to reflect on their roles as both individuals and members of a larger community.

In essence, the narrative unfolds around the idea of perceived authority in conversation and the often blurred lines of morality in public discussions. Du Dewei presents a scenario where people navigate personal opinions and societal pressures, questioning the validity of voices that dominate discussions. Themes of identity and social comparison are prevalent, as the artist weaves through various family names as a metaphor for societal hierarchies, emphasizing that despite different titles and statuses, humanitys essence remains the same.

Musically, the song blends traditional Chinese melodies with contemporary instrumentation, creating a soundscape that is both familiar and modern. The use of repetition in the lyrics serves to emphasize key points and evoke a sense of urgency in the message. Lyrically, Du Dewei incorporates clever wordplay and rhetorical questions, further enhancing the critical examination he presents. This technique effectively engages the audience, prompting them to consider their own beliefs and the influence of external opinions.

Culturally, "" resonates deeply within the context of modern Chinese society, where personal voices often compete with traditional values and collective expectations. It reflects the tensions between hierarchy and equality, making it a significant commentary on current social dynamics. The song not only entertains but also cultivates a space for necessary dialogue about authority, censorship, and the responsibility of all voices in the conversation.